Barker’s planning challenge

Feb. 1, 2005
“Government should take a rigorous approach to revising PPG3. Future revisions should be grounded in an evidence base and should be subject to scrutiny from a panel of housing and planning stakeholders, including the development industry. Restrictions on development should have an identifiable and evidenced benefit that outweighs their costs.” (Barker Review final report, Recommendation 12) In the November Pre-Budget …

Continue reading

To continue reading this article please login or register.

Login

Forgot your password?

Register for free

Quick and free registration

Register